<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comments on Sight Unseen</title>
	<link>http://unexpected.blogsome.com/2008/03/25/comments-on-sight-unseen/</link>
	<description>The Warehouse Theatre weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 23:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: michele</title>
		<link>http://unexpected.blogsome.com/2008/03/25/comments-on-sight-unseen/#comment-124</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://unexpected.blogsome.com/2008/03/25/comments-on-sight-unseen/#comment-124</guid>
					<description>wow, Brock, you must have been really focused to miss the pork chops!  that was undoubtable the highlight of the show.   no, really, what more can i say that traysie didn't already say?  i was riveted. i couldn't believe it when it was over.  it seemed like we had just sat down!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>wow, Brock, you must have been really focused to miss the pork chops!  that was undoubtable the highlight of the show.   no, really, what more can i say that traysie didn&#8217;t already say?  i was riveted. i couldn&#8217;t believe it when it was over.  it seemed like we had just sat down!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brock</title>
		<link>http://unexpected.blogsome.com/2008/03/25/comments-on-sight-unseen/#comment-123</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://unexpected.blogsome.com/2008/03/25/comments-on-sight-unseen/#comment-123</guid>
					<description>Also...wtf?  There were pork chops in the show?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Also&#8230;wtf?  There were pork chops in the show?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brock</title>
		<link>http://unexpected.blogsome.com/2008/03/25/comments-on-sight-unseen/#comment-122</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://unexpected.blogsome.com/2008/03/25/comments-on-sight-unseen/#comment-122</guid>
					<description>Wow.  Traysie is really nice.  Also, the director is the sexiest dang director ever to grace the board at ye ole warehouse theatre...give up for savas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wow.  Traysie is really nice.  Also, the director is the sexiest dang director ever to grace the board at ye ole warehouse theatre&#8230;give up for savas!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: traysie</title>
		<link>http://unexpected.blogsome.com/2008/03/25/comments-on-sight-unseen/#comment-121</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://unexpected.blogsome.com/2008/03/25/comments-on-sight-unseen/#comment-121</guid>
					<description>Sight Unseen is exciting.  It's not because of explosions, or gunpoint kidnappings, or roller coasters with loops, or anything that you would normally think of when you think of “exciting.”  It's the kind of exciting that makes reality TV and low-brow talk shows exciting. IT IS TENSE.  The whole time.  It's exhausting! 

The emotional stakes are so high.  Characters invade each other's comfort with little thought of anything beyond what they want- be they in the little English house or the London gallery.  Everyone is out for themselves.  

I found myself laughing at inappropriate times.  It's because the tactics are so ruthless and yet so subtle.  I feel that if I had seen the same show take place with an audience a-la Jerry Springer (or the Restoration Theatre Era) there would have been not a still person in the place.  Everyone would be up yelling for the character with which they most sympathized!  It would've been pandemonium.

I must say that I saw it twice, (both matinees, naturally) and I found that when the actors indulged the electric silences, at the same rhythm at which they delivered their lines, I became so emotionally engaged that I could hardly sit still.  I would stop breathing and just hold out for the reaction.  All three characters are well developed both in the script as well as by the actors.

Is this the feel-good theatrical production of the year?  Only if you enjoy experiencing catharsis from an emotionally rough story that makes you really reflect on your own actions and how those actions impact others.  I do. So, yeah. It could be…
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sight Unseen is exciting.  It&#8217;s not because of explosions, or gunpoint kidnappings, or roller coasters with loops, or anything that you would normally think of when you think of “exciting.”  It&#8217;s the kind of exciting that makes reality TV and low-brow talk shows exciting. IT IS TENSE.  The whole time.  It&#8217;s exhausting! </p>
	<p>The emotional stakes are so high.  Characters invade each other&#8217;s comfort with little thought of anything beyond what they want- be they in the little English house or the London gallery.  Everyone is out for themselves.  </p>
	<p>I found myself laughing at inappropriate times.  It&#8217;s because the tactics are so ruthless and yet so subtle.  I feel that if I had seen the same show take place with an audience a-la Jerry Springer (or the Restoration Theatre Era) there would have been not a still person in the place.  Everyone would be up yelling for the character with which they most sympathized!  It would&#8217;ve been pandemonium.</p>
	<p>I must say that I saw it twice, (both matinees, naturally) and I found that when the actors indulged the electric silences, at the same rhythm at which they delivered their lines, I became so emotionally engaged that I could hardly sit still.  I would stop breathing and just hold out for the reaction.  All three characters are well developed both in the script as well as by the actors.</p>
	<p>Is this the feel-good theatrical production of the year?  Only if you enjoy experiencing catharsis from an emotionally rough story that makes you really reflect on your own actions and how those actions impact others.  I do. So, yeah. It could be…
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
